Talk:D6 Space

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the D6 Space article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Role-playing games Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Role-playing games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of role-playing games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Role-playing gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Role-playing gamesTemplate:WikiProject Role-playing gamesrole-playing game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

untitled[edit]

Several of us are trying to expand on the articles, please don't just remove these pages as they are a basic work in progress.

Page underway[edit]

I would ask that anyone who is trying to delete this page, based on the assumption that D6 Space is a supplement to an existing game, to do proper research! D6 Space is a stand alone game that uses the same game system as several others. Just as there are many OGL games that are not supplements to Dungeons & Dragons, there are many standalone variations of the D6 System. Dahak 14:37, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to do proper research, but thus far have failed to find any independent writeups of this particular book. Please remember that our criteria for notability is that the subject in question (in this case this particular book) has received a non-trivial writeup in a secondary source which is not simply a copy of a company press release. As anyone can dispute a prod (including the author of the article), and any dispute whatsoever invalidates one, the prod request can and in fact must stay removed. However, failing an assertion of notability from a secondary source, this may be nominated for regular deletion. I will hold off on that pending your response. Seraphimblade 19:31, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Will a couple of reviews on the internet be satisfactory? If so, here are two, one mostly negative, the other mostly positive, and neither by me, nor the manufacturer of the book. Incidentally it took one very brief google search to find both of these, and while my initial comment was not directed toward you, you'll understand my frustration with your efforts. I can add these to the main page if necessary. (http://www.rpg.net/reviews/archive/10/10508.phtml) & (http://www.gamingreport.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=Reviews&file=index&req=showcontent&id=1368) Dahak 20:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bit borderline, but I'd go for those being acceptable. Add them to the main page as references and I'd have no further dispute to this remaining. If you need assistance doing that please let me know. Seraphimblade 21:49, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the offer, I took care of it. I'll take care of the related pages for D6 Adventure and D6 Fantasy, asap. I apologize for being snippy. Dahak 23:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]