Talk:Daddy's Home 2

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Daddy's Home 2 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Film: American

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Negative Reviews:

Why do films get negative reviews from critics? Matt Campbell (talk) 01:43, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Matt Campbell what kind of question is this? why else would films get negative reviews? some people may not like any number of things in film to make them write a bad review. 2600:6C5D:0:A41:5816:BDE8:BC12:D37B (talk) 01:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"Sequel"

JPxG, There's no official report of a third movie in development as of this moment. This "sequel" section only doles out misinformation that a third movie is in development just because Mark Wahlberg says he'd like Liam Neeson to be in the third movie. So why contest an unverifiable content? 112.201.174.89 (talk) 04:35, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the diff, there's no claim being made in that sentence that a third movie is in development. The only claim being made is that someone said they would like to get an actor back in the event of a sequel being made (which is true, and attested to by the multiple inline references that were removed). If you want to edit the section heading to clearly state that there is not a sequel, or even add a line clarifying that a sequel has not been officially confirmed, please go ahead and do so. However, I would advise against edit warring or removing sections of an article because you think they imply something untrue. jp×g 08:33, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]