Talk:Dan McCormack (photographer)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've tried to address the issues cited for this article, but would appreciate any advice on what I can do to further improve it. I'm new at creating articles. Thanks! Leahkathryn
I see you are new here
[edit]Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Dan McCormack, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Greenmaven (talk) 03:17, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Improving the article
[edit]I think you should make clear why this person is notable. Try Wikipedia:Notability (people)
From WP - Scientists, academics, economists, professors, authors, editors, journalists, filmmakers, photographers, artists, architects, engineers, and other creative professionals: The person is regarded as an important figure or is widely cited by peers or successors. The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique. The person has created, or played a major role in co-creating, a significant or well-known work, or collective body of work, that has been the subject of an independent book or feature-length film, or of multiple independent periodical articles or reviews. The person's work either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums.
I hope this helps. I see you have put a lot of work into this Greenmaven (talk) 03:24, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
BTW - you need to sign anything you put on the TALK pages - thus - Greenmaven (talk) 03:26, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Notability
[edit]It would help if you could verify that DM is a professor at Marist College NY and that he has work in The Museum of Fine Arts, Houston
Don't take this personally. People put all sorts of stuff on WikiP and verification of facts is one of the mainstays to maintaining quality Greenmaven (talk) 03:42, 17 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks!
[edit]I appreciate your helpful advice. I'm going to work on addressing the notability aspect of the article. Thanks, Leahkathryn
- Biography articles of living people
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (arts and entertainment) articles
- Arts and entertainment work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- Start-Class Chicago articles
- Unknown-importance Chicago articles
- WikiProject Chicago articles