Talk:Dancing on Ice series 10

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Figure Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of figure skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Figure SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Figure SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Figure SkatingFigure skating articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: British Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the British television task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Copyedit

I have tagged the article for a copyedit as there are too many sentences beginning "it was announced", "it was reported" and "it was confirmed". 78.147.172.235 (talk) 07:27, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 28 January 2018

This edit request to Dancing on Ice (series 10) has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

On the scoring chart, It should say Cheryl & Daniel, not Cheryl & Dan as it says Daniel on the Live show details and on the average chart.90.204.47.61 (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC) 90.204.47.61 (talk) 21:24, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Done feminist (talk) 08:16, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Feminist: Please note that you have edited on behalf of a blocked user, ZestyLemonz (talk · contribs), in violation of WP:BLOCK. --Yamla (talk) 13:05, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yamla: OK, do you want me to revert my edit or something? It seems like a reasonable request if it were made by a user who isn't blocked. feminist (talk) 16:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If I had known that this user was a sock, I would have removed this request entirely. feminist (talk) 16:43, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No need, we can let that edit sit, I think, so long as you are happy with it. Note that the user's talk page indicated they were believed to be a sockpuppet, before they made the request. That's subsequently been confirmed. --Yamla (talk) 16:51, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]