Talk:Das Megaphon

Austria Low‑importance

	Austria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Austria, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles about Austria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project.AustriaWikipedia:WikiProject AustriaTemplate:WikiProject AustriaAustria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Move

I thought about moving this from Megaphon to Das Megaphon yesterday, but I wasn't sure which title was more "official". In most of the books that mention it they use Das Megaphon, whereas on teh official site and on recent covers it's just Megaphon. So I guess either one is probably fine. The books are probably older, but I don't think it makes a big difference either way. rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 13:44, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Das is a German word for "the" so either is probably fine (not implying that you didn't know). I prefer Das Megaphon since it is less likely to be confused with something else. --Apoc2400 (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, that's true. Yeah, Das will probably be better for readers who stumble across this accidentally (although hopefully they'll read it anyway!). rʨanaɢ ^talk/_contribs 14:30, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Das Megaphon. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110607003556/http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_2-7-2003_pg2_23 to http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=story_2-7-2003_pg2_23

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]