Talk:Dat Boi

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Dat Boi article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Poison dart frog?

the claim that dat boi is specifically a poison dart frog probably needs a ^{[failed verification]} on it - 109.224.247.180 (talk) 11:03, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

never mind; it is sorted: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dat_Boi&oldid=880966248 109.224.247.180 (talk) 12:49, 13 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 26 July 2019

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Current	Requested change
Dat Boi is an Internet meme originating from an ~~"Animation Factory"~~ animation of a green unicycling frog.	Dat Boi is an Internet meme originating from an animation of a green unicycling frog from the clipart website Animation Factory.

Reason: It's not explained that "Animation Factory" is a website, the current wording with the quotation marks makes it sound like we're saying "originating from a mass produced animation of a frog".

46.140.184.114 (talk) 22:40, 26 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

     Done Thanks. Dmezh (talk) 06:22, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 29 January 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

in the See Also section, change link from Toad worship (Chinese internet subculture) to Toad worship, article was moved 87.138.137.208 (talk) 16:55, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done avoids a redirect Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:51, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pac-Man

The Pac-Man featured in the original Dat Boi meme originates from a Bloodhound Gang fan video called "Here Comes Pacman" by YouTube user haakor. The source given lists it as being "the" computer animated Pac-Man, when it is not an official Namco model. While the article does do a decent job, calling it "a different meme featuring a computer-animated Pac-Man character", I think a better source should be found and the line should be reworded to something among the lines of "a different meme known as Here Comes Pac-Man". BubzieBobkat (talk) 05:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AP Physics 1 Essentials from 2013?

Is there any source for the "textbook published in 2013"? I found nothing about this in the article cited for the image's first usage in the textbook. Also, it doesn't really make sense, considering that the first AP Physics 1 exams were in 2015. I feel that it would be best to remove that phrase, but I'll leave this comment on the talk page in case someone disagrees. Two, twice^talk 23:24, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]