Talk:Death and state funeral of Ruth Bader Ginsburg/GA1
GA Review[edit]
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 18:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Jasmine Clemons of Planned Parenthood said "I made the best decision for my life, my future and my body ... " but doesn't say what her decision was. If it was an abortion, it's unclear here.
- Done. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- The sentence that begins, "On September 20, former U.S. President Bill Clinton, who nominated Ginsburg" is an incredibly long run-on sentence that takes up half the paragraph. Perhaps make it two sentences?
- Done. --- C&C (Coffeeandcrumbs) 20:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
- C. It contains no original research:
- As far as I can tell, this article is based on news accounts, not OR
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- Earwig's tool flags a lot, but it all seems to be quotations and common phrases and proper nouns that cannot be avoided.
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Per Commons:Photographs of identifiable people and Commons:Copyright rules by territory/United States the images provided are permitted, and documented where uploaded on Commons
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Congratulations. I noticed the nomination by accident today. And today, of all days, it seems appropriate to honor her memory with this review. — Maile (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks, Maile! And thanks, Coffeeandcrumbs, for nominating the article and for taking care of the issues that needed to be addressed so quickly! Nsk92 (talk) 20:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- It's impressive to see this at GA status already. Congrats to all involved! {{u|Sdkb}} talk 23:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Congratulations. I noticed the nomination by accident today. And today, of all days, it seems appropriate to honor her memory with this review. — Maile (talk) 20:36, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
