Talk:Delhi Public School, Vasant Kunj

India: Delhi Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Delhi (assessed as Low-importance).

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

School Assess

Add some sub topics maybe and a picture or two? Welcome Victuallers 08:32, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Delhi Public School Vasant Kunj → Delhi Public School Society — All the branches of Delhi Public School, share some common information, and have been put under the Delhi Public School Society page, Information about this branch already exists in the Delhi Public School Society page, and therefore is a duplicate and should be deleted Alaapdayal 23:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Add # '''Support''' or # '''Oppose''' on a new line in the appropriate section followed by a brief explanation, then sign your opinion using ~~~~. Please remember that this is not a vote; comments must include reasons to carry weight.

Discussion

Add any additional comments:

Oppose

It is true that DPS school share common information but I believe with more than 30 school branches, the original school page would get too long to include substantial detail about the individual branches. Some of the older branches of the school have a long enough history to deserve a page of their own. This page should not be merged with main page. DP 00:52, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose : These are different schools. They may be "branches" of the same society, but they are large, fully functional and for all practical purposes independent of other schools of the same society. Besides, a single page on all DPS schools would get unwieldy. KeynesJohn Maynard 02:20, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peacock Terms and Ad like

Someone attached to the school should rewrite the article like an encyclopaedia article !, it currently looks like an advertisement rather than an article.

"under the dynamic leadership of Shri Vinay Kumar"

"the school has progressed to become an educational institution par excellence"

"Over the last decade, our students have made us proud by making it to premier institutions all over the globe. In the true D.P.S. tradition, we at Vasant Kunj aim at the holistic development of our learners and inculcate in them the spirit of ‘Vasudev Kutumbakam’ – the world is a family." - 1st person ??

"They have been very carefully selected out of the best available talents. These teachers are imbued with the spirit of dedication and devotion. They are not only qualified but also have excellent personality and teaching background."

Lots of other examples too. --TvKimi (talk) 09:19, 25 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:INDIA Banner/Delhi Addition

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Delhi workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Delhi or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 08:00, 6 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:

There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]