Talk:Der brænder en ild

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Der brænder en ild article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Der brænder en ild was a Music good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 16, 2016	Good article nominee	Not listed
June 30, 2016	Good article nominee	Not listed

Current status: Former good article nominee

Denmark Low‑importance

	Denmark portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Denmark, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Denmark on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DenmarkWikipedia:WikiProject DenmarkTemplate:WikiProject DenmarkDenmark articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film: Nordic

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.

Failed GA-nomination

I will expand this article very soon and then re-nominate. I'm sure it will pass. Peace out! Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 20:08, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Additions have been made and the article has been re-nominated. Sorry for the long delay. Best, Jonas Vinther • (Click here to collect your prize!) 16:29, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Der Brænder en Ild/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Carbrera (talk · contribs) 04:44, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox

The movie poster image requires an alt description, so please add one
Any sources out there for the "budget" parameter?
Any sources out there for the "gross" parameter?

Lead

Paragraph 3

"Like several other films adapted by Korch's popular family novels, the film developed a cult following and is regarded as one of the best from the Korch-era." --> No source for this in the lead (or in the article); please add one

Plot

All great! :)

Cast

Great!

Production

There's no mention of the film being based off the book of the same name by Morten Korch here? This is a major piece to the article (and the film in particular!)
"The highly experienced Henning Karmark was the head producer of the film.[1]" --> "highly experienced" sounds a bit bias; please remove

Release and reception

"Journalist Svend Kragh-Jacobsen of Berlingske wrote a favorable review of the film on its release date.[8]" --> Anything to note about Kragh–Jacobsen's review here?
"The film was distributed to home media on DVD in 2003 and again in 2014 by Nordisk Film.[7]" --> Were both releases distributed by Nordisk Film?

Not the nominator, just a Dane with a fondness for this movie, but yes Nordisk Film owns the rights and did both releases. MPJ-US 02:47, 23 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

End of GA Review:

A very good article with just a few mistakes. At first, I thought this may be missing some key things, but after a quick Google search, I realized this movie's article is really using all of its sources out there and ix extremely broad in its coverage! Great work! Please @PING me here with any questions, comments, or concerns. Once again, good job! Thanks and cheers, Carbrera (talk) 02:31, 23 June 2016 (UTC)![reply]

Sorry, but I failed the article due to inactivity for over a week. Please renominate it in the future and I'll gladly review it again. Thanks. Cheers, Carbrera (talk) 03:03, 30 June 2016 (UTC).[reply]