Jump to content

Talk:Dhoom (franchise)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Dhoom (film series))

Dhoom 3?

[edit]

Why is there a Dhoom 3 listed?--Valkyrie Red (talk) 23:34, 1 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any why isn't there an Ultimate Dhoom? 209.189.245.112 (talk) 22:58, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What's an "Ultimate Dhoom" ? — Managerarc[Talk] 08:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"on floors"

[edit]

What does "on floors" mean? Corvus cornixtalk 19:15, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

means "start filming/shooting" --- Managerarc talk 19:27, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hm. In the US, we'd say "In production". Corvus cornixtalk 20:31, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dhoom 3- Back In Action.jpg Deleted

[edit]
 An image used in this article, File:Dhoom 3- Back In Action.jpg, has been deleted from Wikimedia Commons by Adrignola for the following reason: No OTRS permission received
What should I do?
A different bot should have (or will soon) remove the image code from the article text (check if this has been done correctly). If you think the image deletion was in error please raise the issue at Commons. You could also try to search for new images to replace the old one.

This notification is provided by a Bot, currently under trial --CommonsNotification (talk) 00:05, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Plots

[edit]

I think the plots here should be sorter summaries, not a copy of the entire plot from the main articles. BollyJeff | talk 16:37, 28 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dhoom 6?

[edit]

The Future section mentions SRk's son debuting in "Dhoom 6". I know there are sources for this, but are they usable to cite a Dhoom 6? If you read what the articles say, they note that the plan would be for when SRK's son turns 21 (which is in 4 years). This seems like they may have been misquoted or joking, and actually meant Dhoom 4. It took 7 years to get Dhoom 3 made, so I don't think they'll release 3 more films within a 4-year span. Ωphois 05:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please, nothing that far in the furture, WP:crystal BollyJeff | talk 15:47, 24 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Dhoom (film series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:29, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dhoom (film series). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:36, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 22 August 2020

[edit]

Change the infobox cast to

Someone changed it in an old revision, see how it is arranged in other sections; Chopra's character is Bachchan's sidekick. 2409:4073:205:FD52:D480:15CB:3A0C:3A7C (talk) 09:22, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. ◢  Ganbaruby!  (Say hi!) 12:25, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 6 January 2021

[edit]

Film 39.50.89.79 (talk) 14:37, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Seagull123 Φ 16:39, 6 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

In an ode to common practice, the plot is often heavily influenced by the antagonist.

[edit]

in the lead, what does "In an ode to common practice, the plot is often heavily influenced by the antagonist." mean? 2A02:A451:3F63:1:B5FA:F3C6:73D2:B60C (talk) 19:53, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removed, as it was unsourced and senseless anyway. Bollyjeff | talk 23:31, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Dhoom_(franchise)&oldid=1245820038"