This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative medicine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Alternative medicine related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Alternative medicineWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative medicineTemplate:WikiProject Alternative medicineAlternative medicine articles

Alternative Views

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Alternative views, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of significant alternative views in every field, from the sciences to the humanities. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion.Alternative ViewsWikipedia:WikiProject Alternative ViewsTemplate:WikiProject Alternative ViewsAlternative Views articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism C‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

External links[edit]

Untitled[edit]

Hello. Here are the two metaanalysis I found:

Steppan J, Meaders T, Muto M, Murphy KJ. A metaanalysis of the effectiveness and safety of ozone treatments for herniated lumbar discs. J Vasc Interv Radiol.2010 Apr; 21 (4): 534-48.

Please note that it is stated in the article itself (unlike what you can find in the abstract) that such study was funded by ActiveO (Utah), a company with, quote, "a product that relates to the subject of this research. All of the authors acknowledge direct or indirect financial relashioship(s) with ActiveO." Possible conflict of interest? --User:ASMB

Magalhaes FN, Dotta L, Sasse A, Teixera MJ, Fonoff ET. OzoneTherapy as a Treatment for Low Back Pain Secondary to Herniated Disc: A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Pain Physician. 2012 Mar;15(2):E115-29. --Biol. Cons. (talk) 19:36, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

As stated, "The main limitations of this review are the lack of precise diagnosis and the frequent use of mixed therapeutic agents. The meta-analysis included mainly active-control trials. No placebo-controlled trial was found." Yet they still conclude that there is evidence for the application of this therapy with positive results... Nice standards. --User:ASMB

Please write your opinions so we can decide to put this pages as external links or not.--Biol. Cons. (talk) 19:41, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. :-) I'm copy-pasting what I've wrote on the talk page. --User:ASMB

Additional Studies[edit]

This other article presents a somewhat confusing method, in which one group is subjected to O₃ O₂ therapy and the other, additionally, is treated with a more conventional injection of corticosteroid and anesthetic. Why mix both therapies in one group? Despite explicitly stated as the purpose of the study, it would be more enlightening to have both therapies compared separately, as to gauge the alternative's effectiveness. (I know this is a criticism of the article and not of the therapy per se, but it annoys me greatly that there is no definite conclusive study available, put together by disinterested parties). --User:Divided Loyalty