Talk:Doctor Who specials (2008–2010)/Archive 1

Archive 1

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Doctor Who (2008–10 specials). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20091025090732/http://www.gardenofwales.org.uk:80/en/351.html to http://www.gardenofwales.org.uk/en/351.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 08:28, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150104191746/http://www.thedoctorwhosite.co.uk/features/david-tennant-quits/ to http://www.thedoctorwhosite.co.uk/features/david-tennant-quits/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:46, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Doctor Who (2008–2010 specials)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Adamstom.97 (talk · contribs) 09:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

I'll take this one for review for you. I've done a couple of these articles at this point, so I reckon there'll be a few points to cover if it is inline with the others (but nothing major). Hopefully I can get that feedback to you in the next couple of days. - adamstom97 (talk) 09:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)

Okay, not too much from me for this one:

• I think the lead could be filled-out a little bit, just give it a few more details. Also, make sure it is clear that these are just a few special episodes and not an actual season or anything.
• There appears to be a bit of WP:OVERKILL in the development section.
• Is there anything that can be added for the soundtrack section?

Also, I'm not sure if this has been the case in my previous reviews for these articles or not, but is there a reason for having release after the reception section? That seems wrong to me. Let me know, and also let me know if there are any questions about those couple of things. - adamstom97 (talk) 01:38, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Adamstom.97,  Done. Expanded the lead, cut the citations back to one per sentence/paragraph in Development, added info in the soundtrack concerning amount of release, and swapped Reception and Release. -- Alex^TW 03:09, 21 October 2018 (UTC)

Cool, good job Alex, it's all looking pretty good to me now. Pass - adamstom97 (talk) 03:23, 21 October 2018 (UTC)