Talk:Dominus vobiscum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

removing promotional 'other uses'[edit]

I removed the newly added 'other uses' section which listed a catholic retreat, as it was promotional and only primarly sourced. Also see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominus Vobiscum: Marriage and Family Retreat Centre.     Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     12:50, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

The original editor has put back the section, without discussion. I have added this to the delete discussion mentioned above.     Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     14:34, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

When I put back the 'other uses' section, I added a secondary source (a prominent Montreal newspaper). I'm sorry I did so without discussion. Is the source adequate? Also, the 'other uses' section is not new.Steamlunch (talk) 14:38, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps best to first discuss the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dominus Vobiscum: Marriage and Family Retreat Centre, as that is about same subject, and about the validity of the sources therein.     Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     14:40, 4 December 2010 (UTC)
Also, you are correct, the 'other uses' section was not new. My apologies. However the notability of inclusion is still up for discussion.     Eclipsed   (talk)   (code of ethics)     14:46, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Dominus vobiscum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

You may set the |checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting |needhelp= to your help request.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

If you are unable to use these tools, you may set |needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:12, 15 December 2016 (UTC)