Talk:Don (2003 film)

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

About the maintenance banner[edit]

Hey Kailash29792, I noticed that you removed the {{Unreliable sources}} banner from the article, but I don't feel that my reasons for adding that tag have been addressed. Specifically, Viggy's about page indicates that it might be self-published. I didn't check any of the other ones in detail, but that one stood out to me. Let me know what you think. —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:17, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Viggy, along with Chitraloka.com, were the only two websites providing frequent Kannada cinema news in the early 2000s. Kailash29792 (talk) 05:22, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, but the existence of other sources covering certain topics is not relevant to the consideration of this source's reliability. Is there anything that indicates that Viggy might be reliable in spite of its lack of an editorial team, for example, usage in other reliable sources? —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 05:39, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]