Talk:Double Image (novel)

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved: discussion ran for 21 days. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:31, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Double Image → Double Image (novel) — a new page also now exists named Double Image Backup, for which a dis ambiguous page will be made referring to both topics/articles. The proposed Double Image page would then look like this (advise welcome, I am new here):

Double Image commonly refers to:

Double Image Backup, backup software
Double Image (novel), a novel by David Morrell

--M9fky7U2 (talk) 21:20, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; per WP:TWODABS, there's no need for a disambiguation page when there are only two items in question. Just use a hatnote to point readers to the new article. Powers ^T 02:40, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
To most people Double Image without disambigger is double image is double vision, or the result of photographc double exposure or of moving the camera during the exposure, or similar, or a stereographic image pair, not a routine obscure thriller novel. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:28, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, as Anthony says, we seem to have at least three topics here; and if there is a primary one, the novel (whose article is nothing more than a plot summary, so we don't even know that it's notable enough to be here at all) seems to be the least likely contender.--Kotniski (talk) 10:57, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and add a see also pointing to the existing double vision DAB to the proposed new DAB. This does at least barely qualify as a third topic, so it's no longer a two-way DAB. This new DAB as proposed is by far the neatest solution to what could be quite a tricky topic to navigate, especially for those for whom English is a second language (noting that this Wikipedia is for all English speakers not just native speakers). Andrewa (talk) 15:25, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.