Talk:Down syndrome/GA1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vinethemonkey (talk · contribs) 18:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello, and this is Vinethemonkey. I'll review what you have.


All references are good. I see no problem in them. There are enough of them to be believed.

Research section[edit]

It seems to be a stub, even with the outside link. You could either delete it or turn it into a smaller section. You could also fix this up and put more words in it.

Green tickYDone: OccultZone has done this. Please confirm of references and make sure none of them are dead links.


It seems to be good.

Length of article[edit]

It is lengthy enough for someone to understand the concept of it.


It is good enough.

I'm not really sure if a kid wearing a bowl cut putting a bookshelf together is the best image for down syndrome. 2601:190:1:2610:2960:B419:F99C:316A (talk) 02:15, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Other comments[edit]

Check to make sure that none of the references are dead links or lead to a wikipedia page.

Use of list is good.

Decision for now[edit]

I will wait for the fixing of the research section (it's too short). Other then that, I'm satisfied with this article.

@Vinethemonkey:, check now? OccultZone (Talk) 19:11, 24 March 2014 (UTC)
@OccultZone: I'm afraid I do not understand you. What do you mean by check now?VINETHEMONKEY 19:14, 24 March 2014 (UTC)Vinethemonkey
Check Down_syndrome#Research. OccultZone (Talk) 19:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. What was added to the research section was already covered in the rest of the article. We can write more about the issue of stem cell transplantation as this is an active area of research. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 03:01, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

I have added a bit more and we have a link to a subpage. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your page reply on mine) 10:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Final decision[edit]

It is now a good article. Congratulations!VINETHEMONKEY 04:26, 26 March 2014 (UTC)Vinethemonkey — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vinethemonkey (talkcontribs)