Talk:Downwinders

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Environment Start‑class Mid‑importance

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Policy Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Policy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science policy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Science PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Science PolicyScience Policy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[The Conqueror (1956 film)#Cancer controversy|The Conqueror]] The anchor (Cancer controversy) has been deleted.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

Other countries

This topic is relevant to all countries which have tested nuclear weapons, and to other civilian accidents, but only American incidents are covered. At the moment this article doesn't mention the Chernobyl disaster once. 81.155.57.75 (talk) 15:45, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I added links to some other articles, but I'm not competent to rewrite this page. Can someone help? 81.155.57.75 (talk) 16:30, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Opinion in the Santa Fe New Mexican newspaper, Saturday, May 14, 2011: http://m.santafenewmexican.com/Opinion/Second-thoughts-of--downwinders--in-New-Mexico Wikiphan44 (talk) 23:24, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I could write a section dedicated to the Soviet Union but i can't rewite the article RomanK79 (talk) 10:14, 2 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Pregnant women

It seems a bit odd to me that, as emotional a subject as pregnancy is, the subject of pregnancy in fallout situations should have all kinds of studies associated with it. In the current article, there are only two citations: one to pregnant women's emotional health, and one on ideas for better public health systems. The citation required flag has been ignored.

I think perhaps wording like "Specifically, the pregnant woman must receive a radiation dose between the 10th and 40th day of pregnancy high enough to cause mutations, but not high enough to abort or kill the mother", may be part of the problem. Does this mean that mutations caused by radioactivity just don't count if the happen after 3 months? For most certainly, they happen throughout life; every generation passes about 150 discrete mutations from the pattern they inherit from their parents to their offspring, and that's from all sources, not just artificial radioactivity. Or does it mean that if a mutation happens when the fetus is a month old, that in itself puts the mother at risk of death? The whole paragraph is assertions and fuzzy, possibly wishful thinking in search of proof, when I would think the subject should be pinpoint, scientifically crucial.

If downwinders are going to be heard, they need better than a Jenny McCarthy level of representation on the subject, mixed with speculation on how John Wayne died that skips most of the subject material. SkoreKeep (talk) 08:53, 5 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hanford Thyroid Disease Study

This study was not "inconclusive", as this article's author claims. From the study's summary:

"The percentages of people with each kind of thyroid disease or with ultrasound abnormalities were about the same regardless of their estimated radiation dose from Hanford’s iodine-131."

"The findings do not prove that Hanford radiation had no effect on the health of the area population. However, they show that if there is an increased risk of thyroid disease from exposure to Hanford’s iodine-131, it is probably too small to observe using the best epidemiologic methods available."

That is a conclusion, agree with it or not.

96.226.232.173 (talk) 18:44, 15 January 2015 (UTC)D.M.SMITH[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Downwinders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Downwinders. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100823040735/http://www.doh.wa.gov/hanford/publications/overview/overview.html to http://www.doh.wa.gov/hanford/publications/overview/overview.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:17, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Missouri?

Utah nuclear test fallout affects me now. I was growing up in St. Louis. 160.226.138.91 (talk) 08:51, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: HIST 121 - U.S. History since 1877

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 February 2024 and 10 May 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cherubj, HIST121-Augie-student (article contribs). Peer reviewers: Schnickelfritz66, 23omoell04.

— Assignment last updated by Public-historian-90 (talk) 13:36, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a paragraph on the "compensation" section

The paragraph talks about the amendment of the 1990 RECA act to the 2000 version and some major updates that came with it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 20:20, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added a new paragraph

I removed the first sentence from the live article, under the compensation subtopic and added details to make a new paragraph out of it. Cherubj (talk) 20:34, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edit on the 'Nevada' section

On the last sentence of the third paragraph, changed "A 2010 report evaluating data on thyroid cancer incidence from 1973 to 2004 also supports a relationship between exposure from fallout and increased thyroid cancer incidence" to "A 2010 report evaluating data on thyroid cancer incidence from 1973 to 2004 also supported a relationship between exposure from fallout and increased thyroid cancer incidence" for tense consistency and added commas "...which, with the exception of a few test failures, did not release fallout."https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 00:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC) also, on the last sentence of the second paragraph, rephrased "...which were later collected by the Atomic Energy Commission to gather data about radiation levels." to "...which the Atomic Energy Commission later collected to gather data about radiation levels."[reply]

Minor edit on the 'Nuclear Testing' section

Replaced the very last sentence with "These nuclear tests infused vast quantities of radioactive material into the world's atmosphere, resulting in widely dispersed radiation and its subsequent deposition as global fallout." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:HIST121-Augie-student (talk) 00:30, 8 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed comma splice

Added a comma in the first sentence of the second paragraph.

More generally, the term can also include those communities and individuals who are exposed to ionizing radiation and other emissions due to the regular production and maintenance of coal ash, nuclear weapons, nuclear power, nuclear waste, and geothermal energy. …” instead of “…More generally, the term can also include those communities and individuals who are exposed to ionizing radiation and other emissions due to the regular production and maintenance of coal ash, nuclear weapons, nuclear power, nuclear waste and geothermal energy….” Cherubj (talk) 14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Added a missing comma

added a missing comma on the first paragraph.

…ranges primarily in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico, and Utah but also… instead of …ranges primarily in Arizona, Nevada, New Mexico and Utah but also… Cherubj (talk) 14:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Changed a conjunction

Changed the conjunction "as" to "when" in the last paragraph as it's more appropriate in the sentence.

"In fact, the health effects of radon were first widely acknowledged when Mormon and Native American miners who hardly smoke (the main reason for lung cancer) had high incidences of lung cancer." Cherubj (talk) 14:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]