Talk:Dreams (The Allman Brothers Band album)

Fair use rationale for Image:AllmansDreamsCover.jpg

Image:AllmansDreamsCover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 06:09, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Wasted Time R for adding a fair use rationale to the album cover image. — Mudwater 01:59, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Needs Some Cleaning

This article looks as if it was put together in a hurry, which is likely was. The description sounds like a copy-and-paste from another source, said copy-and-paste missing enough context for its second sentence to make sense. The track listing also only has notes for if a track is "maybe" unreleased, and has no mention if a song was a recording by The Allman Brothers, the Allman Joys, the Hour Glass, etc. and doesn't note that a couple live songs on the box set are indeed live. Not to mention the big ugly personnel list. I think I might fix the description a bit and fix up the notes for the track listing myself. --Stop being such an awesome (talk) 23:24, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds like a plan. The article looks better already. — Mudwater^(Talk) 00:07, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I'm done with my edits for now. I'm still not sure what to do about the personnel list; it's a good thing as far as a completeness is concerned (though it def needs cleaning up what with the stray commas and the like), but it's probably plain excessive and should maybe be removed altogether for that reason. --Stop being such an awesome (talk) 00:57, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to simply comment out the personnel section, as the pages for other box sets lack such a section. Anyone else is free to make the removal permanent or uncomment it if they wish. --Stop being such an awesome (talk) 01:08, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to put it back then. It's true that it's just a big long list of everyone, which is not an ideal situation, but I think the article is better with it than without out. But, thanks for the other improvements. — Mudwater^(Talk) 01:29, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, somebody's gonna have to go through it and fix it up. The things like "guitar" followed by "guitar (acoustic)" and coexisting with things like "guitar (electric)" is kinda iffy, not to mention there's people who are listed who haven't played a part in the creation of this album or the material on it (for example, Warren Haynes is listed as personnel, but none of his work with the ABB is on Dreams because his first recorded work with them was released in 1990) (scratch that, I suppose Haynes probably appeared on one or more of the Betts solo numbers on here). --Stop being such an awesome (talk) 01:43, 8 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]