Jump to content

Talk:Dual diagnosis

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Dual diagnosis/CommentsTalk:Dual diagnosis/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

"Dual Diagnosis refers to the diagnosis of an individual with both a intellectual disability and a co-occurring serious mental illness" is the first sentence of the article "dual diagnosis". I speak from personal experience with dual diagnosis and I also appeal to what I believe is common knowledge: "dual diagnosis" is a technical term used by mental health professionals to refer to the co-occurring disorders of drug-and-alcohol abuse/dependence and mental illness. In other words, it means mental illness coupled with addiction. This meaning is so widespread and commonly understood that the original writer's statement can only be regarded as bizarre and probably offensive (what is meant by an "intellectual disability"?). In any case, the above-cited assertion is certainly incorrect from the point of view of common knowledge. I am equally certain that mental health professionals would take the same exceptions to it that I have here pointed out.

Substituted at 21:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Dual diagnosis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:37, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RESPONSE TO FIRECATALTA - i have not made any changes to any part of the text on the dual diagnosis page. I am trying to communicate with editor "FIRECATALTA". I CLICKED ON YOUR NAME ( A LIVE LINK) AND I DO NOT SEE ANY WAY TO SEND YOU A MESSAGE at your pa

[edit]

RESPONSE TO FIRECATALTA - i have not made any changes to any part of the text on the dual diagnosis page. I am trying to communicate with editor "FIRECATALTA". I CLICKED ON YOUR NAME ( A LIVE LINK) AND I DO NOT SEE ANY WAY TO SEND YOU A MESSAGE at your page. I am used to not knowing what to do on wikipedia. I hope you will receive and provide a timely reply to this new message May 23, 2017. WE HAVE HAD SOME INTRICATE DISCUSSIONS REGARDING SCIACCA'S CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE FIELD OF DUAL DIAGNOSIS. THE SENTENCE IN THE "HISTORY" SECTION REFERENCES VERY LITTLE OF THAT CONTRIBUTION AND DOES NOT CLARIFY the breadth and scope of the initial work and the evolution stemming from that initial work. The notice of Sciacca SEEMs EXTREMELY MARGINALIZED FOR SOMEONE WHO WAS THE INNOVATOR OF ANY TREATMENT WHATSOEVER FOR THE TREATMENT OF A WORLDWIDE NEGLECTED POPULATION OF PEOPLE WHO HAD SERIOUS ILLNESSES AND WERE TREATED AS CRIMINALS in many cases. IN ADDITION THE KEY LINE IN the history section ...THE MID 1980's etc., etc. references one Sciacca publication and a Drake, et. al. publication - Drake, et. al. had done nothing in regards to dual diagnosis in the mid 1980's, they were not even on the scene and should not be referenced there in the same sentence which implies they made contributions during the time of inception of treatment in 1984 for the dually diagnosed which they did not. In addition I have searched out other sources of articles/ videos (one in the library of congress) primary, secondary, tertiary, etc. These denote this "first" original, pioneering work where the ground work was performed and demonstrated and the difficult task of creating enthusiasm for mental health workers to treat substance abuse and substance abuse programs to acknowledge and address mental health - this yielded program development across systems and services and statewide initiatives where nothing had been done before and a great deal of neglect and frustration ensued. I look forward to hearing from you to review the exchanges we have had and the additional materials I have acquired. I am hopeful that a just result will ensue here. I am very uncomfortable to leave this as it is. 69.86.190.126 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC) (69.86.190.126 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)). 69.86.190.126 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 (talk) (69.86.190.126 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)) May 23, 2017  69.86.190.126 (talk) 04:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education assignment: Contemporary Moral Issues

[edit]

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 March 2025 and 18 April 2025. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Anrizvon (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Bernstein.lau (talk) 03:06, 8 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]