Talk:Duchess of Richmond's ball

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on June 15, 2015 and June 15, 2018.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Archives

Archive 1

This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by when more than 6 sections are present.

Dances[edit]

It's a pity there is nothing yet about what dancing was done, apart from a reference to Scottish reels. Given that anniversary balls are happening this year, it would be good to know any actual dances, which could perhaps be recreated.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Peterwlane (talk • contribs) 11:35, 10 June 2015‎ )UTC)

A good point. I have added a quote and a link to The Times who did not approve of the waltz! -- PBS (talk) 16:30, 21 June 2015‎ (UTC)[reply]

Similar start to the Russian Campaign[edit]

Alexander I received a message about the Neman crossing on June 24 while attending an evening ball at the Zakret countryside manor near Vilno. His manifesto declaring the beginning of war with France was published in the Russian Empire the next day.[1]

War and Peace, start of Chapter III:

Count Bennigsen, being a landowner in the Vilna province, offered his country house for the fete, and the thirteenth of June (Old Style) was fixed for a ball, dinner, regatta, and fireworks at Zakret, Count Bennigsen's country seat.
The very day that Napoleon issued the order to cross the Niemen, and his vanguard, driving off the Cossacks, crossed the Russian frontier, Alexander spent the evening at the entertainment given by his aides-de-camp at Bennigsen's country house.
It was a gay and brilliant fete. Connoisseurs of such matters declared that rarely had so many beautiful women been assembled in one place. ...
General Balashev, one of those in closest attendance on the [Tsar Alexander], went up to him and contrary to court etiquette stood near him while he was talking to a Polish lady. Having finished speaking to her, the [Tsar] looked inquiringly at Balashev and, evidently understanding that he only acted thus because there were important reasons for so doing, nodded slightly to the lady and turned to him. Hardly had Balashev begun to speak before a look of amazement appeared on the [Tsar's] face.

— Leo Tolstoy

— PBS (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See Palace of Zakret -- PBS (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also the 1862 Christmas ball at the start of the Vicksburg Campaign (see the article "Balfour House"). -- PBS (talk) 00:57, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Duchess of Richmond[edit]

user:Surtsicna See WP:BRD, the idea you make a bold edit if it is reverted then it is up to you to gain a consensus on the talk page, not revert and ask the other editor to do so.

The surname is not needed, any more than it is for the Duke of Wellington or William, Prince of Orange. In the case of the Duchess it is even less needed as her husband (who's surname name it was, her maiden name was Gordon), is mentioned with surname in the next sentence. -- PBS (talk) 11:49, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WP:BRD also says you should explain in the edit summary why you are reverting an edit. I would have been very grateful if you had done that, since this way it seemed rather "brusque".
Unlike the Duke of Wellington, the Duke of Richmond or the Prince of Orange, the Duchess of Richmond is the eponym of the Duchess of Richmond's ball, the subject of this article. She is the central personality in the article. If the woman had a surname, and that surname is good enough to be included in the title of the article about her, I do not see why we should make an effort to conceal it from the readers. To deny her a surname because her husband is mentioned with it later on strikes me as odd. If her own surname at the time was not Lennox, as you seem to imply, that should certainly be mentioned at Talk:Charlotte Lennox, Duchess of Richmond. Surtsicna (talk) 12:07, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is not know as "Charlotte Lennox, Duchess of Richmond's" ball or "Charlotte Lennox's" ball. The Duchess of Richmond is not the central personality of the article she is merely the hostess, if anyone is the central personality it is the Duke of Wellington. Usually one would write Mr and Mrs w. xyz one does not usually write Mr w. xyz and Mrs v. xyz. It the norm that the surname of the man is the married name of the woman. If that is not so, it would usually be noted, but not if it is. -- PBS (talk) 16:10, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Lede[edit]

I cannot see why my new lede of 19/1/19 should have been largely reverted. The opening sentence seems clumsy, the Elizabeth Longford quote is not represented in the article, and is full of cites, which don’t belong in the lede. Valetude (talk) 12:57, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

We can not write in the passive voice of the article that it is the most famous ball in history, although it is often stated that it is in reliable sources, because it is a POV. To get around that we use a quote (see WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV). Likewise that most of the senior officers in the British Army cantoned around Brussels were there. We could move those quotes into an introduction and then summerise them, but as the whole lot is only a sentence long it is bloating the article for no good reason. As they are quotes they need citations. -- PBS (talk) 22:09, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Partly agree. But if the Longford quote were to be cited in the main article, would it not be acceptable to reference it briefly in the lede without the need for cites? Valetude (talk) 21:58, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comte and Comtesse Mercy d'Argenteau[edit]

Comte and Comtesse Mercy d'Argenteau probably Eugène-Guillaume Argenteau, but needs verification. -- PBS (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]