Talk:EFuse

Electronics Low‑importance

	Electronics portal This article is part of WikiProject Electronics, an attempt to provide a standard approach to writing articles about electronics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Leave messages at the project talk pageElectronicsWikipedia:WikiProject ElectronicsTemplate:WikiProject Electronicselectronic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Computing: Security Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Prologue

The Droid X doesn't implement eFuses, it uses the ones implemented in the TI OMAP processor which is already referenced. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.110.119.246 (talk) 19:18, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are you seriously using a post in a forum discussion- one that cites this very page to back up its claim- as proof that eFUSE technology is being implemented in the Motorola Droid X? Acedea9 (talk) 17:02, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article is very inaccurate. There are several efuse technologies, not all are reversible. And even if they are it is not given that the implementation permits reversing it through JTAG. Nor is it given that the device even implements JTAG.

Efuses are found on nearly any medium or more complexity digital integrated circuit —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.2.202.16 (talk) 18:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it any different from NOR flash memory? L29Ah (talk) 20:33, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on EFUSE. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:48, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TODO: Citations

Hello, I came to add information about the Nintendo Switch in this article and noticed the lack of inline citations. Is anyone here able to find some info on this and add them to the work cited for inline citations? Currently there is only an article about blown fuses in the Switch at the moment. thank you 🐺RooWritten🐺 _TALK 23:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just another use case

Tesla uses fuses to store the hash of a root CA used as a trust anchor for the following boot process. Source: https://cdn.media.ccc.de/congress/2023/h264-hd/37c3-12144-eng-deu-Back_in_the_Drivers_Seat_Recovering_Critical_Data_from_Tesla_Autopilot_Using_Voltage_Glitching_hd.mp4?1703781973 David-ri93 (talk) 19:13, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge with Programmable_ROM?

The lede currently starts with

In computing, an eFuse (electronic fuse) is a microscopic fuse put into a computer chip. This technology was invented by IBM in 2004 to allow for the dynamic real-time reprogramming of chips

From the Programmable_ROM page:

The PROM was invented in 1956 by Wen Tsing Chow, working for the Arma Division of the American Bosch Arma Corporation in Garden City, New York. The invention was conceived at the request of the United States Air Force to come up with a more flexible and secure way of storing the targeting constants in the Atlas E/F ICBM's airborne digital computer. The patent and associated technology were held under secrecy order for several years while the Atlas E/F was the main operational missile of the United States ICBM force. The term burn, referring to the process of programming a PROM, is also in the original patent, as one of the original implementations was to literally burn the internal whiskers of diodes with a current overload to produce a circuit discontinuity.

It seems that the whole idea of blowing microscopic fuses to reprogram a chip was invented in 1956 by Wen Tsing Chow, and then in 2004 IBM came up with the idea that they could re-brand half a century old technology as something new by giving it a fancy name. If "eFuse" technology does indeed do anything that makes it different from a good old OTP-ROM then the article should explain that. Otherwise I think it should be merged with Programmable_ROM mentioning that some chips using OTP-ROM memory are being marketed as having "eFuse" technology. PoiZaN (talk) 15:24, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]