Talk:Eco-efficiency

	Environment portal This environment-related article is part of the WikiProject Environment to improve Wikipedia's coverage of the environment. The aim is to write neutral and well-referenced articles on environment-related topics, as well as to ensure that environment articles are properly categorized. Read Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ and leave any messages at the project talk page.EnvironmentWikipedia:WikiProject EnvironmentTemplate:WikiProject EnvironmentEnvironment articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2020 and 12 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Emmastarkk, MarcelaOrdonez.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 20:02, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

merge

see Talk:Ecological efficiency

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Eco-efficiency. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:26, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Dispute - History

"It was their involvement which catapulted eco-efficiency from a brilliant idea to a workable concept"

The use of "brilliant" is considered a signal of puffery under MOS:PUFF and needlessly introduces bias. The section assumes a consensus that the concept is both "brilliant" and indeed a "workable concept" despite criticisms of it and related concepts (e.g. Fletcher & Rammelt 2017). Would suggest deletion of sentence as beyond introducing bias it does not add to the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowand017 (talk • contribs) 13:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV Dispute - Uses

(Seen after initial tagging of History section)

"Furthermore, eco-efficiency is also a very useful tool"

I would suggest this fails to be impartial. Consider instead 'The World Business Council for Sustainable Development considers eco-efficiency a useful tool because it is seen to be flexible to company size, while also maintaining relevance with the larger scale of government and national policies" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rowand017 (talk • contribs) 13:12, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]