Talk:Eldorado Jones

Eldorado Jones was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 27, 2017). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Eldorado Jones/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 06:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewing. But this is at best start class; it has no section structure (GAN Criteria 1b), and is very short given the available sourcing (3a). Given the dates, there should exist photos of the subject (6), and roughly 1/3 of the text consists of a quote farm from the sources rather than original prose. The references and external links are out of order (1b again), one extlink appears to be a blog (WP:ELNO), one reference (Aquila) is a deadlink that appears to be another blog (2b), and another is a primary source (a patent (2b again). I don't think this is close to ready for GA review. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:28, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, David! Omphaloscope talk 22:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]