Talk:Electoral reform in Canada

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles

Elections and Referendums

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Unsourced speculation removed

I removed the following unsourced, POV paragraph from the end of the article:

On the federal scene the New Democratic Party, the Green Party, the federal Liberals in Alberta, and all federalist parties in Quebec would be the most obvious potential beneficiaries of a proportional system, since they routinely receive far fewer seats than their number of votes would warrant. The regionalist and separatist Bloc Québécois, which is routinely over represented in the Canadian House of Commons would most likely suffer the most under any proportional system. On the Quebec scene the Liberals and the ADQ would be the main beneficiaries, while in Ontario the Progressive Conservatives were more under-represented in the 2003 election results than the NDP.

This might be reasonable speculation, but it's original research, and biased at that. Rewrite it a bit, add some sourcing and it's good to go. - Haunti (give'r) 05:44, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]