Talk:Emirates (airline)/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

I beleive this is a good article, and think its C-class rating is too low. It has many images, and provides refrences for everything. (MoHasanie (talk) 11:07, 7 June 2009 (UTC)).[reply]

Theres a lot of junk in the article and it needs a really good cleanup. But I'm a big fan of Emirates so it would be good to see it with a good article status. I'll try and make it better if I can.

PS:How do you suggest a re-evaluation? Because theres some articles and I would like re-evaluated.

Thanks a lot, --Plane Person (talk) 18:43, 4 August 2009 (UTC).[reply]

That would be great to remove all the junk in order to make it a GA class article. Can you please point out the junk info, so that it can be removed. That would be great if you could. --MoHasanie Talk 14:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Closing GAR

This article is not a former Good Article Nominee and does not appear to be a former GA, so the use of a GAReassessment is inappropriate. If you think that the article is GA-standard, the appropriate response is to nominate the article at WP:GAN. Pyrotec (talk) 19:20, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]