Talk:Endorsements in the 2015 United Kingdom general election
This article is rated List-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Semi-protected edit request on 29 April 2015
[edit]This edit request to Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Labour Party has the support of the New Statesman [1]
Hampshireaser (talk) 14:21, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Done Thanks! AusLondonder (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 30 April 2015
[edit]This edit request to Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Morning Star is supporting Labour [2]
Hampshireaser (talk) 07:07, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks for the tip! AusLondonder (talk) 08:21, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
Daily Express and UKIP
[edit]Has the Daily Express actually officially endorsed UKIP? AusLondonder (talk) 07:42, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 1 May 2015
[edit]This edit request to Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
The Guardian - Labour [3] Hampshireaser (talk) 12:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Done Thanks again! AusLondonder (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
The Guardian has endorsed Labour
[edit]Can somebody update the article to include this?
http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/may/01/guardian-view-britain-needs-new-direction-needs-labour — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.100.245.99 (talk) 12:29, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Not the whole story. They endorsed the LD in seats where the Tories were the main alternative. This info has been included, just as the caveats for other papers' endorsements are included.77.73.168.99 (talk) 13:56, 1 May 2015 (UTC) Done Thanks for the tip! AusLondonder (talk) 15:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Semi-protected edit request on 3 May 2015
[edit]This edit request to Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015 has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Remove endorsements for Mirror on Sunday, Sunday Mail and Daily Record endorsements. Mirror on Sunday "endorsement" is an article written by Ed Miliband, Sunday Mail and Daily Record articles do not contain endorsements (at best they contain opinions of the newspapers, but not inducements for readers to vote a certain way).
Mattsmithetc (talk) 22:00, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Done Thanks! Bondegezou (talk) 22:33, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
The Mail have urged voters to vote Conservative - "Voters have a stark alternative: turn to Cameron for prosperity, security and unity".
Similarly, the Mirror rarely features article explicitly saying 'vote Labour' given the paper is Labour through-and-through, but usually carries the sort of articles as the Miliband one. Indeed, the tag line says 'Labour leader states his case to Mirror readers with a passionate message of hope'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Matt 2601 (talk • contribs) 23:04, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
Matt 2601, you're confusing the Mail on Sunday with the Sunday Mail (the latter is the Sunday edition of Scotland's Daily Record). On the Mirror, no-one will be less surprised than me to find that the Mirror supports Labour, but the fact is that the link simply does not point to an endorsement, so I think it's best left out.
Mattsmithetc (talk) 08:47, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
Independent
[edit]I don't think the definition of the word "endorse" necessarily implies instructing other people on how to vote. It is sophistry to think that the Independent's endorsement of the C/LD coalition is any less of an endorsement than the other papers' endorsements. 86.130.140.76 (talk) 23:00, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly. They quite obviously endorse another coalition government with the Conservatives as the lead party; just because the opinion piece was written in a rambling, inadequate style doesn't mean that the paper hasn't given an actual endorsement.--Autospark (talk) 23:26, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
References
[edit]External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 9 external links on Endorsements in the United Kingdom general election, 2015. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/4484a46e-0818-11e4-acd8-00144feab7de.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bathchronicle.co.uk/Lib-Dems-entice-donors-chance-win-dinner-Bath/story-26332344-detail/story.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150507022754/http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/politics/ge2015/game-of-thrones-star-backs-snp-in-gordon-brown-s-former-seat-1.872225 to http://www.thecourier.co.uk/news/politics/ge2015/game-of-thrones-star-backs-snp-in-gordon-brown-s-former-seat-1.872225
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.alpabroad.org/news/2863.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://sera.org.uk/2015/04/20/labour-launches-green-plan/
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.unison.org.uk/news/labour-s-manifesto-gives-voters-a-real-choice-says-unison
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150530164140/http://www.cornishman.co.uk/Queen-legend-Brian-visit-Penzance-support-Lib/story-26344051-detail/story.html to http://www.cornishman.co.uk/Queen-legend-Brian-visit-Penzance-support-Lib/story-26344051-detail/story.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150417130145/http://www.carolinelucas.com/latest/former-labour-councillors-back-caroline-for-pavilion to http://www.carolinelucas.com/latest/former-labour-councillors-back-caroline-for-pavilion
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150511040220/http://www.hampsteadandkilburnlibdems.org.uk/endorsements to http://www.hampsteadandkilburnlibdems.org.uk/endorsements
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 9 October 2017 (UTC)