Talk:Enterprise portal
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled
[edit]Could someone please add a clearer definition so that we know what website classifies as a portal and which does not.
I'd also like to see a few examples, if that's possible. THANKS -- Michael Janich (talk) 07:42, 20 August 2008 (UTC)
It'd be a good idea to check all portals in the table for new version numbers, verify the licence and check the JSR compliance. I've checked the JSR compliance for the latest stable version only. -- borg42, 12 January 2009
removed link to a service company "function1" - advertising -- eddiexx77, 11 Feb 2010 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.73.4.177 (talk) 20:54, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
Java only?
[edit]I am about to add some content in here on WSRP. I wanted to make sure there wasn't a reason for its absence. This article is extremely Java-centric and I would counter-balance that a little. I will wait a week and then add some content. Alex Jackl (talk) 13:47, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
List of Enterprise Portal Vendors
[edit]This list has become a list of spam links. I am proposing that the list be trimmed down to only include notable vendors (those with Wikipedia articles). I think that there could also be some benefit in removing the whole section to a new page. Any comments or suggestions appreciated. Vrenator talk 10:46, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
- I have now removed the list of vendors to List of enterprise portal vendors and also removed red links, external links and addtions without articles. Vrenator talk 09:27, 6 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Enterprise portal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070910230955/http://www.infoworld.com:80/article/04/01/09/02FEportal_1.html to http://www.infoworld.com/article/04/01/09/02FEportal_1.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)