Talk:Epitome Astronomiae Copernicanae
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Some thoughts
[edit]The Epitome helped to spread Kepler's ideas, but it is a matter of opinion whether it should be called "influential".
Publication date of first volume of first edition
[edit]I have found no evidence that the first volume of the first edition appeared in 1617, although the Epistola dedicatoria is dated August 1617. However, title pages attest instead to 1618 -- as does the title page of the volume displayed on the page -- and no 1617 date is found in WorldCat. The DNB authority link also asserts 1618 as the first date. Unless convincing evidence is presented here within the next few days, I will change the publication date of the first volume of the first edition from 1617 to 1618. Or, if you are as convinced as I am, please change it yourself... Belastro (talk) 23:15, 28 April 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class history of science articles
- Low-importance history of science articles
- WikiProject History of Science articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles
- Low-importance Astronomy articles
- Start-Class Astronomy articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Book articles
- Book articles without infoboxes
- Wikipedia requested photographs of publications
- WikiProject Books articles