Talk:Evangelou v McNicol
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
In progress
[edit]Article created. I have written on background and the High Court judgment. I'm aware that it is important to get a similar level of detail on the CoA judgment, especially seeing that it overturned the decision and I wouldn't want for the article to be biased. I'm working on it, but it's a lengthy judgment and I'd appreciate any assistance. Best, Shayday~enwiki (talk) 17:48, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Useful links
[edit]Is Jeffers v The Labour Party[2011] EWHC 529 (QB) available online anywhere or is it firewalled? Timrollpickering (talk) 21:36, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Just had a look and can't find a transcript. I'm sure there would be something on Westlaw or Lexis, but not that we could use on here. Just saw that you cleaned up my refs: thanks I appreciate it! Shayday~enwiki (talk) 20:00, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- No probs. A pity about the case - given the growing propensity to take political issues to the courts, it would aid public interest to have all transcripts in such cases easily accessible. Timrollpickering (talk) 23:50, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- C-Class Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance Politics of the United Kingdom articles
- C-Class Elections and Referendums articles
- WikiProject Elections and Referendums articles
- C-Class socialism articles
- Low-importance socialism articles
- WikiProject Socialism articles