Jump to content

Talk:Exelon Pavilions/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    "Beeby is also the designer of the Joan W. and Irving B. Harris Theater for Music and Dance." - parenthetical... remove as it doesn't have anything to do with the Exelon Pavilions.
    I revised the text to clarify the significance of the link.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:51, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    "The North Pavilions are the first Chicago buildings to use building integrated photovoltaic cells, i.e., a solar energy system incorporated into the building's construction materials." - why the i.e.? That clause seems to be a definition of the term.
    I reworded this.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 00:34, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    " the future expansion of the Art Institute of Chicago." - calling it the Modern Wing is probably OK; linking to it would be better. Spellcheck on "pavlions".
    There is no link for the Modern Wing that I know of.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
    "The pavilions provide sufficient energy to power the equivalent of 14 star-rated energy-efficient houses in Chicago." - checked the source, and sure enough, that's what it says. star-rated should be linked... somewhere. Energy Star?
    Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTM) 01:54, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
    Need more details as to what that actually meant.
    At some point it should be noted that Exelon and ComEd are energy utilites/distributors (whichever is technically correct).
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    I tried to think of other major aspects of the pavilions, but couldn't really think of any. So it looks pretty good; just some minor issues. —Rob (talk) 22:09, 8 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I addressed a couple of points, and now I think it meets the criteria. —Rob (talk) 13:00, 9 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]