This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.
Exhaustion of intellectual property rights is part of WikiProject Open Access, a collaborative attempt at improving the coverage of topics related to Open Access and at improving other articles with the help of materials from Open Access sources. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Exhaustion of intellectual property rights is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a collaborative attempt at improving Wikimedia content with the help of openly licensed materials and improving Wikipedia articles related to openness (including open access publishing, open educational resources, etc.). If you would like to participate, visit the project page for more information.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pirate Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pirate Politics articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This is supposed to be a general Wikipedia article about the exhaustion of intellectual property rights, without being focused on U.S. law. The Clugston article is in fact only used to support rather general considerations. --Edcolins (talk) 20:20, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
I think you are right. It is more than enough just to cite Kirtsaeng in a footnote and let it go at that. PraeceptorIP (talk) 21:25, 30 June 2015 (UTC)