Talk:Expansion timeline of the Moscow Metro

Trains: Rapid transit / Soviet Metros Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Metros of the former Soviet Union.

This article lacks references.

An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Colours

Pale green colour like this - unreadable. I'd recommend adding another column for Line and removing all colour coding. NVO (talk) 05:11, 7 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Use "Capri" from Beijing Line 10 then, because why not? 81.89.66.133 (talk) 08:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Line 11 "disappears" for no reason

Line 11A (Kakhovskaya) "disappears" on the current graph, while line 11 does not appear. In the same time, Kakhovskaya line is a part of modern Line 11, so it was not closed. I would recommend count all line 11 and line 11A stations together (just like line 8 and 8A is counted together). 81.89.66.133 (talk) 08:04, 25 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How it makes the graph imperfect

The dimple between Line 11 and Line 11A makes the chart a bit little imperfect: line 1, line 2, line 3 ... line 10 "take a hit" as well. IMO, the graph should put Line 1 to the bottom, put line 2 atop of it, put line 3 atop of it and so on. Sorry for bad "artisan English" skills: je suis a non-native English user. Профессор кислых щей (talk) 06:52, 1 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]