Talk:Extracellular
This article was nominated for deletion on 8 June 2020. The result of the discussion was redirect. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
GO citation
[edit]When citing GO, it would be best to refer to AmiGO- AmiGO is an 'official' product of GO, EBI is not related. Sort of like citing information about Texas from a website made by Iowa. http://amigo.geneontology.org/amigo/term/GO:0005615 would be the right source but I don't know exactly how to cite it on this page. As stated on http://geneontology.org/page/go-citation-policy#GO_Data, please include the file version or DOI for any GO definitions- this is on the bottom of AmiGO pages ( DOI 10.5281/zenodo.1899458; Last file loaded on 2018-12-02). The Ontology is more or less a living being and some parts are expected to change between releases.
Also, the important info that is cited as the "GO definition" is mostly from ISBN:0198547684, this may be a more appropriate source. The GOC (GO Consortium) should be cited for the Comment: "Note that for multicellular organisms, the extracellular space refers to everything outside a cell, but still within the organism (excluding the extracellular matrix). Gene products from a multi-cellular organism that are secreted from a cell into the interstitial fluid or blood can therefore be annotated to this term."
I edited out the "database" bit because it's the GOC that makes the ontology, the database is just where it's accessed.
Thank you all! GO (please contact our Helpdesk on GitHub for any clarifications) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 171.66.209.5 (talk) 23:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)
Merge
[edit]I don't see why extracellular needs its own article. It can be a category in cell.
Anyone agree? --Brazucs (TALK | CONTRIBS) 16:35, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- I disagree. I don't see why it needs to be combined. Cburnett 01:12, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Extracellular. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080214151745/http://circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/92/3/587 to http://www.circ.ahajournals.org/cgi/content/full/92/3/587
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)