Talk:FEC v. Ted Cruz for Senate
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education assignment: Money and Politics
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 August 2023 and 14 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Mo&pocap (article contribs).
I want to add history and precedents that Section 304 of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act enforced. I think it would be good to add some history of the bipartisan act, and add the opposing/supporting views of the act. I would also like to add that the FEC moved to dismiss the case because of Cruz's lack of standing, but that notion was denied.
Example: On August 24, 2021, the Federal Election Commission filed to dismiss the motion on a lack of standing. The request was denied.
References Jagodinski, Mitchell. “Federal Election Commission v. Ted Cruz for Senate.” SCOTUSblog, www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/federal-election-commission-v-ted-cruz-for-senate/. Accessed 17 Sept. 2023. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mo&pocap (talk • contribs) 04:24, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
— Assignment last updated by Chiderahanaebue (talk) 19:46, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class United States articles
- Low-importance United States articles
- Start-Class United States articles of Low-importance
- Start-Class Texas articles
- Low-importance Texas articles
- WikiProject Texas articles
- WikiProject United States articles
- Start-Class U.S. Supreme Court articles
- Low-importance U.S. Supreme Court articles
- WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases articles