Talk:FIA Super Licence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Formula One (Rated Start-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Formula One, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to Formula One, including drivers, teams and constructors, events and history. Feel free to join the project and help with any of the tasks or consult the project page for further information.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Spelling of "Super Licence"[edit]

The web address name of the article uses "Super License" but the actual article uses "Super Licence". Can we at least have some consistancy here... which is it? Graybriggs 15:22, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

The PDF of Appendix L to the ISC (linked from the article's external links section) has "Super Licence" and "Super licence". Majin Izlude talk 20:34, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
Argh! It should be "license," not "licence." It's only referred to incorrectly in the PDF as "licence" b/c the FIA doesn't translate English properly. Azx2 19:17, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Er, no. In British English (in which this article is written), "license" is a verb and "licence" is a noun - see for further information. Also, regardless of the variety of English used in the article, when quoting a reference (including the reference title), the spelling should exactly match that used in the reference. DH85868993 (talk) 01:31, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
OK. Azx2 01:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Licence to print money[edit]

How do teams get their Super Licences to qualify to participate? TREKphiler any time you're ready, Uhura 21:07, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Additional sources needed[edit]

This article stub needs some additional verifiable, reliable sources (of which I'm sure there are thousands). I just edited the section on the cost of the super-license and added two additional references to the same BBC article that the section was basically plagiarized from w/o being appropriately cited. LAZY! Come-on, people! Don't plagiarize stuff and not give credit and pass off an entire BBC article as your own work... Azx2 18:33, 17 February 2013 (UTC)