Jump to content

Talk:FV107 Scimitar

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Falklands

[edit]

i would like to piont out that scimitars where also used by 2 and 3 para during the falklands campaign, and probably the royal marines as well http://www.raf.mod.uk/falklands/goose1.html http://www.raf.mod.uk/falklands/images/ggscimitar.jpg

they were operated by the blues and royals not the paras and marines though they were under command of 3 commando brigade. yerkschmerk

Infobox

[edit]

The infobox needs units added to it; I guess the dimensions are metric (but that's only a guess), but if so, what's the speed? MPH or KPH? I certainly don't know the details (only at this page following friendly fire links). Carre 23:41, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Units?

[edit]

Add units to the dimensions. Length is 4.9? Uhhh, 4.9 what? Even more ambiguous is the weight. 8.07? Haha, come on people. KDR 22:45, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The template used to include preset units. Hard to say how ambiguous a weight of 8.07 is - its British vehicle so will either be in (long) tons or tonnes which are close enough to make little difference. If its length is 4.9 its unlikely to be in feet, so it'll be metres. GraemeLeggett 16:11, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
You're kidding, right? Go to other tank pages and see if they use units. I'm sorry, but have you ever taken so much as a middle school science course? You ALWAYS ALWAYS ALWAYS label dimensions and measurements with units. M1_Abrams, M103_heavy_tank, M41_Walker_Bulldog. There are just three random tanks that all have their measurements labeled. It may be obvious to a tank enthusiast that it is meters or tons or whatever else, but there are a lot of stupid people out there. But don't do it for the stupid people, do it to follow the proper conventions. KDR 22:35, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ability to make tea?

[edit]

There's the trivia about all British tracked vehicles being able to make tea for crew members. Is this true? If so, where's the source? 84.230.213.132 13:16, 22 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The vehicle itself doesn't make tea, but it does have a boiling vessel which allows them to keep a constant supply of hot water on the go for a quick brew. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.192.118.219 (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ability to make ...stool?

[edit]

I'm sorry but even in a specially ventilated vehicle, who "go's" inside a tank, what you can't make a ten second stop in the fallout out side? The worst thing that makes this seem fake is that, I mean yes, commander is the sh***iest job in the tank because of the danger, but would they really put in HIS seat?! - gabriel

I assume it serves a dual purpose, allowing him to crap on his crew in peacetime, while shitting himself when under attack 86.44.90.135 (talk) 11:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC) OK, revisiting this comment, it seems it's actually TRUE! Will provide reference on main page to image of seat in question (while not in use) 86.44.90.135 (talk) 12:04, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tea

[edit]

All British army armoured vehicles a have a BV (Boiling Vessel) in which enables hot water to be boiled using the vehicles electrical syste. Brews on the move are essential yet messy for the British Army to function! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.127.178.41 (talk • contribs) 23:14, 23 April 2007

A brew brings coalition forces closer together, Lipton's tea mission takes top cuppas to Iraq --Philip Baird Shearer 12:12, 24 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The boiling vessel is not just for making tea its for producing meals when the vehicle is locked down in a CBRN enviroment,all ration packs issuedd can be cooked just by re-heating,in the BV —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jamessweney (talk • contribs) 11:52, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replacement

[edit]

Hi. I understand its replacement has been announced (or it could just be a contender), according to a post on militaryphotos.net (which I now cant find). Anyone got any information on that? Thanks Chwyatt (talk) 09:31, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

This website is available to edit by members of the public and thus fails WP:RS. Ryan4314 (talk) 20:25, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on FV107 Scimitar. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:10, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:FV107_Scimitar&oldid=1198020804"