Talk:Factitious airs

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History of Science Low‑importance

	History of science portal This article is part of the History of Science WikiProject, an attempt to improve and organize the history of science content on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. You can also help with the History of Science Collaboration of the Month.History of ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject History of ScienceTemplate:WikiProject History of Sciencehistory of science articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Paywalled source

If anyone has access to this: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11624650/

Bull Anesth Hist. 2000 Oct;18(4):1, 4-6.

doi: 10.1016/s1522-8649(00)50046-8.

Joseph Priestly's "factitious airs" and medical therapy before 1800: a brief review

A J Wright

Then I'm sure it would be useful for expanding/verifying this article. It's not available in the WikiLibrary (Elsevier publication) PamD 14:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pam I checked this paper via sci-hub, unfortunately it did not seem to be a good reference despite the name. What was the issue with the recent additions that were reverted? SloppyTots (talk) 06:57, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you did not cite any sources for the content you added. PamD 07:01, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Pam That's fair. Would you kindly restore any content you agree with (as a quasi peer-review) and I'll immediately provide the citation? I respect that your experience as a WikiEditor and that you had established this page. I've just been interested in this topic over the past several months and hope to share some of the insights I've gained, largely from the carbon monoxide perspective. Best wishes SloppyTots (talk) 07:08, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]