Talk:Fagun

Newspapers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Newspapers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Newspapers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NewspapersWikipedia:WikiProject NewspapersTemplate:WikiProject NewspapersNewspapers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Verifiability and tone

Hi Rosguill, you added a tag critizing those two points. I am a bit surprised, especially at the tone question. Could you please point out which words or sentences could be considered unencyclopedic? English is not my mothertongue and I might have missed a nuance that causes this impression.

As to the sourcing - I know that sourcing generally is a problem for topics regarding minority issues and marginalized people, especially in a non-historic context. But I think the sources that were added now should be sufficient. I would therefore ask you to consider removing the tag, as it will be very difficult to provide more strong sources. --Kritzolina (talk) 08:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've gone ahead and removed the refimprove tag. As for tone, there are some sentences that come off as a bit promotional, but if you're not a native English speaker I wouldn't worry about it too much: the important thing is that it's in a work queue now and a more fluent editor will eventually take care of it. If I get a chance I may take a crack at it later today. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:56, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I will take note of any changes and try to learn. --Kritzolina (talk) 18:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

First publication was on 15th april or 9th april of Fagun newspaper

source support

In this article the date of publication of newspaper is given as 15th april 2008 but their is no mention in the reference listed here:- as given in this article as its source|Allindiaaseca.
I have found a source which has mentioned The first publication of Fagun as April 9, 2008 source:-| Orissa post

But its not sufficient to prove that on which particular date it is published, if anyone had good source please mention. --Rocky 734 (talk) 10:04, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]