Jump to content

Talk:Fair to Midland

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

I rewrote this article, due to the pretty poor state it used to be in. What little is left from the actual text body should probably be expanded with a short summary of the band's biography from the official site (not a verbatim copy of it). The copyright issue should be solved now, since the article contains nothing, most other band related articles sport, i.e. track listings and a promo photo. As for notability: The band appears to have several professionally produced and widely available albums under its belt and the official site isn't a random garage-band-myspace page. - Cyrus XIII 18:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First sentence said it "was" a band but used present tense to say it "is" based in Dallas. Cleaned up the stupid first sentence. Deleted the founding date because it cluttered up a sentence that was getting too long and rickety. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2605:6000:EF05:6C00:43B:176D:FA4D:C59D (talk) 13:02, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Here is the source: http://www.totalassault.com/team.php?team_id=212. janejellyroll 09:11, 21 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, if someone wants this article to have a proper biography section so bad, that person should just sit down and write one up - with proper references of course. - Cyrus XIII 13:51, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Classification issues

[edit]

I cannot seem to find any justifiable reason nor reference to cite for Fair to Midland being listed as Metal. Albeit, it does say "Folk Metal" and the band does clearly exemplify folk influences but I feel use of 'metal' should be reviewed as it is misleading, mis-representative and convolutes a classification which should be striving for a concise simplicity. PinkTentacle (talk) 02:54, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fourth Studio Album

[edit]

I removed the "untitled studio album" entry from the list since it seems no one seems to have any idea what it will be titled, nor can they agree on whether it will be released in 2009 or 2010. Sigurj (talk) 00:18, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up of "Fourth studio album"

[edit]

it seems the paragraph is just a bunch of garbled up information from the first mention of the new album to present day. so since this article is only updated when the band release song names.i will do some modifications , also i moved the crash to its own sectionProxysix (talk) 04:33, 12 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Fourth Studio Album" Spam

[edit]

Does anybody know why people keep changing the album title to either inappropriate or simply incorrect names? I just corrected it a few hours ago, and it's already been changed. As a member of the official Fair to Midland forum, there is significant speculation regarding the album title, and Arrows and Anchors is considered to be the most likely at this point. --Beatlehippie (talk) 05:33, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "was" in the introduction

[edit]

No official source -- the band or anybody well-connected to the band -- have confirmed that Fair to Midland is no more, so the introduction should not be "Fair to Midland "was" a ..." it should be "is" until this is confirmed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.209.106.237 (talk) 07:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Fair to Midland. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 04:34, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]