Talk:Falcon 1e

This is the talk page of a redirect that has been merged and now targets the page:
• SpaceX launch vehicles
Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at:
• Talk:SpaceX launch vehicles
Merged page edit history is maintained in order to preserve attributions.

Spaceflight

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SpaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Spaceflightspaceflight articles

Rocketry

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Rocketry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of rocketry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RocketryWikipedia:WikiProject RocketryTemplate:WikiProject RocketryRocketry articles

Delete?

Why is there an article on the Falcon 1e? There is already an article on the SpaceX Falcon 1. This article is a duplicate. --129.54.8.46 (talk) 19:13, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Falcon 1 and 1e are different rockets - completely different first stage, other modifications and upgrades. It is our standard practice to create articles for different rockets. --G W… 19:24, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would favor a merge, this article is quite small, and the little information there is seems to already be wrong or outdated 68.199.173.69 (talk) 04:47, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Being out of date is not grounds to merge an article. It simply needs to be updated. Whilst it is currently rather short, it will expand as more details of the system become clear, and especially once it begins flying. I see no reason to depart from the system we use for all other orbital launch systems for this one case, which is in no way exceptional. --G W… 06:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Angara rocket series share one article even though they've made just as many launches as the Falcon 1e TMV943 (talk) 05:10, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's simply because there isn't enough information to split that article yet. WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --G W… 06:17, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I would lean to agreeing with the merge as it appears they don't even intend to fly this and on the manifest they themselves don't even differentiate between the 1 and 1e. seems to me it should just be on the 1 series and mention the upgrades. -Tracer9999 (talk) 21:27, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Retired?

According to the spacex page "Current plans are for payloads that would fly on Falcon 1 to be served by flights on the Falcon 9, utilizing excess capacity. This is a very cost-effective solution for small satellite launch needs." and no launches of any falcon 1 or 1e are listed thru 2017. -Tracer9999 (talk) 20:52, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removed outdated tag

I changed the article to reflect the fact that the Falcon 1e is on hold, which I assume is the reason for the "outdated" tag, and removed the tag. NumberC35 (talk) 15:41, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Falcon 1e. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120222034638/http://www.spacex.com/Falcon1UsersGuide.pdf to http://www.spacex.com/Falcon1UsersGuide.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:42, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]