Jump to content

Talk:Federal funds probability

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Key references are missing making this article dubious

Redirect and reverts

[edit]

User:Red Phantasm has redirected this article to Federal funds rate twice, and User:Tquek has reverted twice without discussion. We should generate a consensus here before continuing. I support the redirect, as this subject is of dubious notability and lacks sourcing. Any relevant information can be covered in Federal funds rate. -FrankTobia (talk) 17:14, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A redirect/merge clearly is appropriate. As a standalone, this article is an unsourced orphan and begs for deletion. John M Baker (talk) 23:22, 2 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Federal funds probability. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]