Jump to content

Talk:Ferguson Research

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Ferguson Research Ltd.)

P99

[edit]

I found lots of links, but no article about to the Ferguson Felday P99 F1 racing car according to their blurb, only 4-wheel F1 winner ever, in 1961

If I remember correctly, the drive was four hydraulic swashplate motors (one for each wheel) but only a brief Wiki entry here and a better an external reference to hydrostatic transmission . Maybe someone might have enough info to start a full article on one of these two subjects? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Timpo (talkcontribs) 15:21, 9 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Do you mean the Ferguson P99? DH85868993 (talk) 09:18, 10 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ferguson Research. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]