Talk:Flaubert's Parrot

Novels Mid‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Why doesn't the article mention that Barnes missed the point?[edit]

"Not for nothing does Félicité confuse Loulou with the Holy Ghost", writes Barnes. But then he goes off on a hundred tangents and does not find out, why she does. The reason for this is not, as the article claims, that there are so many stuffed parrots around in the real existing world. The reason is, that there is no "parrot" at all in Flaubert's story, but only in very bad translations of that story. Flaubert was never shortlisted for the Booker prize, but he was very particular about the birds he would use in connection with the Holy Ghost: a dove maybe, but a bullfinch or a bat certainly not. To Félicité he gave a perroquet (at the time aka paroquet or paraquet), which is exactly fitting. Flaubert knew, what he was writing about, and did not have a tin ear. If he had written in English, he would never have used "parrot", because "parrot" does not bring up the Holy Ghost in front of anybody's spiritual eye. Instead he would have used PARAKEET. --Hanno Kuntze 09:31, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think Hanno is suggesting that Flaubert was playing with the similarity in sounds (in French) of parakeet and Paraclete which is used of the Holy Spirit. Nedrutland (talk) 10:09, 6 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Flaubert's Parrot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060212074925/http://www.julianbarnes.com/bib/fp.html to http://www.julianbarnes.com/bib/fp.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:36, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]