Talk:Flexcoin
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Flexcoin redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
The contents of the Flexcoin page were merged into History of Bitcoin on 09 March 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
Notability
[edit]I would argue that, due to the overwhelming press coverage of Flexcoin presently, this article is notable. Cyborg4 :) (talk) 19:55, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps, but there are only those two Reuters articles referenced that give any indicate. There needs to be more than just a handful of references about its closing to indicate that it is notable enough for an article. Perhaps Flexcoin would be better covered in a section of History of Bitcoin instead? -IagoQnsi 20:05, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Relevant policy: WP:NOTNEWSPAPER. I think this material would be great merged into another article, but I don't know that it's notable enough to stand on its own. -IagoQnsi 20:07, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
- Merged. Cyborg4 :) (talk) 20:24, 9 March 2014 (UTC)