Talk:Flying Padre

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Film (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.


From WP:RfD:

  • Flying PadreStanley Kubrick -- seeing as the ONLY thing that links here is the Stanley Kubrick article and the unused template, the redirect is nonsenseWeebot 03:19, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
    • Sigh. These used to be stubs about shorts by Kubrick, and got turned into redirs to his article. Since they are films by a very major film artist, I think having nothing under these names is inappropriate. We can either i) turn them back into stubs, or ii) remove the links to them in Stanley Kubrick, etc, and keep them as redirs; I don't have any particular preference for which we do. Noel (talk) 19:47, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
      • Since these were only redirected by an anon, and they were perfectly reasonable stubs, reverting to those stubs is obviously the right course of action. sjorford #£@%&$?! 10:49, 12 September 2005 (UTC)
        • Will do. Noel (talk) 01:39, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

Added some content (there's not much to add, alas :-). Noel (talk) 19:28, 15 September 2005 (UTC)


Perpetual stub Since Kubrick's short films were so short, their individual articles will inevitably be stubs. They should be merged into Short films of Stanley Kubrick. -Justin (koavf)·T·C·M 07:15, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

I think I agree, but let me see what happens if I try to flesh it out a bit - does it end up looking like an article, or at least a more respectable stub? I'll work on it for a while. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 03:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
It's a decent stub now, but I don't think it will ever be anything much more than a stub. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont) 04:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
The proposed merge article seems not to exist, so I've removed the merge tag. Ed Fitzgerald (unfutz) (talk / cont)