Talk:Force protection condition

THREATCON in computing Merger

Because ThreatCon is mentioned in the Information Operations Condition (INFOCON) page, it should either be merged into that page or made into its own page. Although similar to INFOCON, it's not maintained by the US Government, so a seperate page might be a good idea. But I have noticed that they often increase together, although INFOCON can be raised by reports of terrorists trying to gain access to US government computer systems while ThreatCon is usually limited to threats to home users and private businesses. ~Tom Owens

Things about Military sound electronic device that use in one hand

This device must sense a sound in area that at any action to search enemy. In front of this device, have very sensitive diaphragm(I thing that it must thin plastic looks like a parabolic antenna). When this device sense any sound, for example in mountain, electronical PCB in device in t=0,00... s calculates: direction and distance of a sound(sound of enemy). At this point, on LCD screen soldier see a direction and automaticly distance about source of sound. If it haven't any new sound, soldier see fixed knowledges. But, if device hear a new sound, device calculate again and send to LCD screen new knowledges that soldier must see. Note about device: Device, send image about last sounds source and if soldier go to left or right side, device automaticly print on LCD screen direction with distance according sound's source.

netiq69 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Netiq69 (talk • contribs) 11:04, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

DEFON

Defcon does not "assesses the amount of military forces needed to be deployed in a situation with a certain likelihood of attack against the civilian population." DEFCON is readiness status of the military for combat.Royalcourtier (talk) 00:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Force Protection Condition. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110527045437/http://www.northcom.mil/News/2007/070307.html to http://www.northcom.mil/News/2007/070307.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070417000729/http://www.iiimef.usmc.mil/g4/high%20speed%20vessel%20%281%29.htm to http://www.iiimef.usmc.mil/g4/high%20speed%20vessel%20%281%29.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:37, 3 October 2017 (UTC)