Jump to content

Talk:Form I-94

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Image

[edit]

The image is too small to be able to read the text on the form. Can anyone upload a bigger scan? --Richardrj talk email 07:34, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Discontinued?

[edit]

I'm pretty sure that these have now been discontinued - can anyone in the know confirm? IIRC certain US ports of entry had dropped them as far back as 2008. I didn't need to fill one in when landing in San Francisco that year, though I did for Chicago in 2009. Mr Larrington (talk) 15:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't remember getting one last year, either. All I needed was the ESTA, and of course the customs form. (No, I wish I was carrying over 10,000 dollars!) Wouldn't know whether it's officially discontinued everywhere, though. Knight of Truth (talk) 19:59, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

At the bottom of the article,(through the supporting link) it says that these forms are discontinued on May 21. I can confirm that as of 4th of July they are no longer attached to passports of visiting tourists. There is a website (https://i94.cbp.dhs.gov/I94/request.html) where the I-94 number can be retrieved. The article probably needs to be substantially edited.

This is supposed to have been discontinued for passengers arriving by airlines or ship since 2013. Apparently they get the data from the airline or the ship. But for those who cross by land this is still supposed to be valid. Suitable amendments and references must be given in a wikipedia article. I came here after checking a number of sites. I had a hunch I will get a confirmation from a reliable source such as Wikipedia. I was disappointed to see this remains un-updated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.167.244.109 (talk) 06:20, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Form I-94. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Form I-94. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:09, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]