Jump to content

Talk:Fortaleza da São Tomé

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Information needs to be verified

[edit]

Information needs to be verified The information contained in this article needs to be verified. A search for references turned up this link [1] which states that "Kottappuram Fort, built by the Portuguese in 1523 was referred to popularly as Cranganore Fort and is now known as Kodungalloor Fort." Unimaize (talk) 18:10, 7 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Fortaleza da São Tomé

[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Fortaleza da São Tomé's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "EB1911":

  • From Dhar:  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Dhar". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 8 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 142.
  • From Kodungallur: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Kodungalur" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 885.
  • From Bijapur Fort: Chisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Bijapur" . Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 3 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 928.
  • From Kalinjar Fort:  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Kalinjar". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 15 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. p. 642.
  • From Daulatabad Fort:  One or more of the preceding sentences incorporates text from a publication now in the public domainChisholm, Hugh, ed. (1911). "Daulatabad". Encyclopædia Britannica. Vol. 7 (11th ed.). Cambridge University Press. pp. 848–849.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 17:39, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]