Talk:Fortunate Son (Hatfield book)

	Books portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Alternate Media Report of Events[edit]

I've added the POV template because this section is not written neutrally. It is one thing to state an alternate point of view, but this section expresses it in factual terms. The reference to ' our third edition' also suggests this has been copied & pasted from a publisher's blurb. Ben Finn 14:25, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This article absulotely needs to be removed. You are right this is a point of view book, however, an article published by the National Enquirer is being censored by Wikipedia, and it is a POV (allegation) article that President Obama had an affair durring the 2004 Sentorial campaign.

STOP THE OBVIOUS BIAS. You censor one you got to censor the other. Article or Book, irrelevant, both are allegations/rumor. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.82.20.85 (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This article needs a rewrite[edit]

The book is notable, even though the allegations are unsubstantiated. However, all of these allegations in the book are anonymous and unsubstantiated. Furthermore, weasel words are liberally used. An expunction, even if true which is highly suspect, is not a cover up. Lulaq (talk) 02:09, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]