Talk:Fraternal Order of Police v. City of Newark

This article was nominated for deletion on October 1 2006. The result of the discussion was keep.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Jry96.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 21:48, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Updating Police v. City of Newark

I plan to describe the legal context in which this decision sits. Specifically, I'll lay out the main legal question presented by the case (how many exceptions are acceptable for a law to still qualify as neutral and generally applicable under Employment Division v. Smith), and provide context by outlining why this is still an open question under Supreme Court precedent and how the answer offered by the Ninth Circuit differs from then-Judge Alito's answer.

Sources for this project: ^[1] ^[2] --Jry96 (talk) 13:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ 1. Religion and the Constitution, Michael McConnell, Fourth Edition
^ 2. Merric J. Polloway, Constitutional Law-First Amendment-Free Exercise Clause Forbids Police Departments to Discipline Officers Who Wear Beards for Religious Reasons When Other Secular Reasons for Wearing Beards Already Merit Exemptive Status, 30 Seton Hall L. Rev. 397 (1999).

[1] 1. Religion and the Constitution, Michael McConnell, Fourth Edition

[2] 2. Merric J. Polloway, Constitutional Law-First Amendment-Free Exercise Clause Forbids Police Departments to Discipline Officers Who Wear Beards for Religious Reasons When Other Secular Reasons for Wearing Beards Already Merit Exemptive Status, 30 Seton Hall L. Rev. 397 (1999).

[1]

[2]